1.24 Battle generation vs. no existing enemy ships

[highflyer]

Hi,

what i always found weird is the battle generation. Cruiser battles with no enemy cruisers, carrier battles in 1903. I know that it is supposed to be inaccurate, but when the enemy can`t field a single cruiser or carrier, why will those battles be proposed. Accepting those battles will result in 2 cruisers and 6 destroyers vs. only 2 destroyers?

Attachments:

[dorn]

Hi highflyer .

This is really weird, I had no such carrier battle so early. Have you got save?

Relating to disproportion of forces, you can always decline battle in area where you have not enough force and let enemy do his mission unopposed. D
Sometimes one side get significantly larger force which is thing which happens in history. It simulates all things that could happen as wrong intelligence report, wrong decision in command staff etc. 

[highflyer]

Sorry i don`t have the exact save, when that happened. I also never seen a carrier battle that early in about 300+ hours of playing the game. I though it was a little more off than usual, as nobody possibly had achieved building a carrier nor a plane (its 1908 now and still no planes).