|
|
Post by macdandee on Aug 4, 2019 18:17:57 GMT -6
I'm still enjoying the game, but am taking a break till the aircraft xp issue is fixed --- a rough eta would be much appreciated.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by tbr on Aug 4, 2019 18:59:42 GMT -6
I just started a game with late aircraft development to bridge the gap
|
|
|
|
1.07 ETA?
Aug 4, 2019 21:18:48 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by dohboy on Aug 4, 2019 21:18:48 GMT -6
The XP issue seems to improve in late game. At 1964 more than 3/4 of my squadrons are now 'Good'. Not a single elite squadron though, despite every carrier being elite. I haven't put a carrier or airfield in reserve for a few decades, I think maybe that helped do something besides gobble cash.
|
|
|
|
Post by JagdFlanker on Aug 5, 2019 2:45:22 GMT -6
my TBs have had absolutely no problem slamming torpedoes into enemy ships in my current game even though their experience shows as poor/fair
also, assuming enemy air groups have the same problem (which we have no way of knowing, but i suspect they do) then experience affecting either side is a wash
|
|
|
|
Post by tbr on Aug 5, 2019 4:09:07 GMT -6
As long as the airgroups show any experience there is no major problem, it becomes one when (not if) their experience runs out of the definition corridor and they show just a blank space instead of an experience level. That seems to be the point where the formulae in tactical combat break.
|
|
|
|
Post by williammiller on Aug 5, 2019 9:04:09 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by akosjaccik on Aug 5, 2019 9:33:58 GMT -6
As always, I am grateful for the updates, fantastic work!
Checking the notes, while I do believe the implementation of armed merchants in convoys is a welcome step, I am a bit afraid that it might cause some frustrations if the player is consistently given two (especially early) destroyers for an attack force for example, but I don't want to throw around hard statements without actually testing, of course.
|
|
