Post by ludovic on Apr 30, 2023 11:12:29 GMT -6
When I am at war with an enemy whose home location is not mine, I naturally try to increase my base capacity so all my warships can fit without being short of supply. However, quite often, the war ends before the capacity is increased, even when I start the increase before the war starts.
Then, once I have won the war, the base capacity increase goes along as planned, and then the defeated country complains about the increase in capacity.
I would think that allowing an increase in base capacity to watch over a defeated enemy would be the bare minimum allowed as part of a treaty, especially one that is a surrender rather than a neutral peace. I guess the solution that would be easiest would be to just cancel any tension increases based on base capacity increases that started before the war ended.
(It wouldn't capture the edge case of a truly neutral peace that the PC desires, which rarely happens, but in that case you should be able to cancel the capacity increase to avoid tension increases, which would be harder to program.)
Then, once I have won the war, the base capacity increase goes along as planned, and then the defeated country complains about the increase in capacity.
I would think that allowing an increase in base capacity to watch over a defeated enemy would be the bare minimum allowed as part of a treaty, especially one that is a surrender rather than a neutral peace. I guess the solution that would be easiest would be to just cancel any tension increases based on base capacity increases that started before the war ended.
(It wouldn't capture the edge case of a truly neutral peace that the PC desires, which rarely happens, but in that case you should be able to cancel the capacity increase to avoid tension increases, which would be harder to program.)
